featured article

How do we integrate the YWAM Values into our ministry?

Examine, intentionality and discernment are key ways to integrate values into ministry and life.

How often do we honestly take time to examine our ministry in light of the values God has called us to as Youth With A Mission? If someone were to observe your team or ministry location, could they identify any or all of the values we teach and say that we live by?

Examine or evaluation is an important practice as teams and ministry locations. Honest evaluation on a regular basis helps us to stay true to our values and to recognize when one or more values are being neglected. This is not only done by one person or just the leader. It is a healthy practice to do as a staff team. We all have blind spots that we are not aware of and different team members will see how different values are being integrated or not being integrated. It’s important that we listen to one another and allow for staff to voice their concern if they feel one of the values or more are being neglected.

As a Discipleship Training School leader, I co-led a school with a younger woman who was leading a school for the first time. Championing young people and working as a team were two of the values that our co-leading was expressing. What I found crucial to our success in leading together was a simple meeting we had every Friday afternoon. At the end of the week we would get together and ask how things went that week as far as us leading together? Did we communicate well? Did we overstep boundaries we had set up in the beginning of the school in regards to each of our responsibilities? Were either of us offended by the other in some way? I found these meetings to be so helpful. Sometimes they were very short and we agreed that we were doing well. Other weeks we had things to talk through, discuss and clear up between us. We wanted these values to not just be statements of belief, we wanted them to be beautifully expressed in how we co-led together. For us, a weekly evaluation or examine of our leadership was absolutely crucial to stay on target in living out those values.

In teams, whether a team leading a school or an outreach, it is so important to create a practice of evaluation. As we identify values that we do not see strongly displayed, we can address these and ask some questions as to why these values not being expressed. We can gain much insight into our teams and individuals as we identify the values we struggle to exhibit. We can also gain insight as we recognize our strengths, the values that we easily live out and integrate.

Intentionality is another practice that contributes to us seeing the values fully expressed in our locations. It is such an important concept. It is especially crucial in our present culture where so much of what we do is done with the push of a button or a tap on a keyboard. We can easily lose our sense of responsibility and effort in living out the values, especially as they require a purposeful effort. The values are full of action verbs. We must be ready to take action and ask ourselves how intentional are we when it comes to the values? We read Value #9 – have a Biblical Worldview, but do our staff understand what that is in practicality? A simple yet powerful way we integrated this value into ministry when I lived in Sarajevo was by picking up trash in our neighborhood. We lived in an area on the side of a mountain, with many green, grassy plots of land. At certain times those fields would be littered with trash that had blown out of the dumpster or had just been thrown there. We as a staff spoke often about what a Biblical Worldview looks like lived out on a daily basis. As we prayed we were led to show what our worldview of the earth was and we physically expressed what it means to steward the earth, to care for the place where we lived. Our neighbors were astounded that we would pick up trash and we noticed in the following months that there was less and less trash just thrown anywhere. Living out that value physically affected our neighborhood.
Our staff turnover in many locations is quite high. As we welcome new staff do we intentionally train them in not just a head knowledge of Biblical Worldview, but a daily practice of it? After being on staff for many years, it is easy to forget that we need to constantly and intentionally talk about, discuss, evaluate and live out the values. It is not a one time orientation to the values, but an on-going practice. We intentionally pay attention to, train staff and live them out day by day.

A third practice is discernment. We as leaders need to practice discernment in how well we are living and implementing the values. Discernment can take time. We must discern what God is saying to us concerning the values as we pay attention to global conversations. These are not easy processes, we need God’s wisdom to stay true to what He has called us. As I said earlier, we can often do what we have done before because it “worked” and forget that we need to be listening and discerning God’s voice in each and every school, seminar, outreach, etc. Value #12 is Do first, then teach. Are we as school leaders and ministry location leaders using discernment as we invite people to speak into our communities, whether it be in a school or in a community meeting? Are we discerning that those we invite to share are living by this value, of doing first and then teaching? This is a powerful value and one that acknowledges God’s authority on someone as they teach out of their life, not just from a prepared lesson. Discerning the seasons and the times for specific words, prophecies and teaching is crucial. We can become lazy or assumptive when it comes to input into our locations. We may think that because a certain person had a word before or was doing and teaching before, they are automatically still in the same place. Discernment helps us know who and what to invite into our communities. Discernment also is part of self-evaluation, searching our own hearts to see how we are doing in staying true to the values.

“Search me, God and know my heart, test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there be any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting” (Psalm 139:23,24,NIV).

This Psalm is an intentional cry from David to evaluate or examine his heart and to discern how he is doing before God and toward others. May we as a mission and as the body of Christ also examine, discern and be intentional before God and others as we live out the mission, purpose and values to which God has called us

Why not explore some other featured articles

Grievance Procedure Paper

Process for Dealing with *Grievances Against Leaders (and other figures of authority within YWAM) *Grievance  –  an  official  statement  of  complaint  over  something  believed  to  be  wrong,  unjust or  unfair. Begin  with  the  concise  overview,  and  for  a  more  detailed  explanation,  click  on  each  link provided  or  go  directly  to  the  full  version  from  page  4. This  document  is  mainly  dealing  with  situations  and  conflicts  where  there  is  no  evidence  of criminal  offence  or  activity.  Where  there  is  suspicion  of  serious  criminal  offence,  we  are obligated  to  contact  the  police. OVERVIEW STEPS   TO   TAKE   IN   DEALING   WITH   GRIEVANCES   AGAINST   LEADERS CONTEXT STEP 1 When  someone  has  a  grievance  against  another  person,  they  should  go  and  share  their concern  as  Matthew  18  encourages.  If  your  concerns  are  not  heard,  Matthew  18  advises taking  a  friend  with  you  as  a  follow-up  to  help  in  the  dialogue.  This  may  be  difficult  because of  differences  in  position  and  influence,  but  it  should  be  attempted  to  keep  the  issue  and situation  as  low  key  and  relational  as  possible.  We  expect  that  most  cases  will  be  resolved here  in  step  1  and  kept  in  the  local  situation. STEP 2 If  a  resolution  hasn’t  been  successful  in  step  1,  a  simple  mediation  process  is  encouraged  with an  impartial  mediator  bringing  together  the  two  parties.  The  mediator  or  mediators  should  be people  who  are  agreed  upon  by  both  sides,  and  could  be  elders,  not  necessarily  in  line leadership,  who  have  some  understanding  of  mediation.  This  will  enable  both  parties  to  share 1

Read More »