featured article

‘Thinking’ About Vocation 

The word vocation comes from the Latin word “vocaré”, which means to call or name. It is a term that has been extensively discussed amongst scholars and theologians and throughout the centuries has been associated primarily with those who occupied positions within the clergy or church domain. That meant other forms of work, such as being a homemaker, a farmer or an artist for example, were considered less honourable and sacred for they existed to deal with life on earth rather than heavenly matters. Today the term vocation is mostly used to describe one’s career or profession, and the idea of work being part of our calling is a foreign concept to most.

The Impact of Dualistic Thinking. The separation between everyday work and Sunday worship has enormous impact on the effectiveness of the church in society. Many people mistakenly think that our engagement with the world has only a spiritual nature, resulting in spirituality often being divorced from what constitutes one’s work in this world. This disconnect comes from several points of origin, one being the Enlightenment, which changed the way we relate to the cosmos. Christianity has been heavily influenced by the resulting dichotomized thinking that separates the spiritual from the natural world. This has greatly influenced how we imagine vocation and a biblical view of work. According to author and speaker Landa Cope (2011), “In our focus on evangelism, missions, traditional church ministry, and the secular-versus-sacred dichotomy, we have nearly lost the theology of the laity, a godly perspective of work outside of the institution of the church”. Although the separation between the spiritual and natural world is not based on a biblical worldview, sadly dualistic thinking has been attached to Christian practice for centuries. In the fourth century, Eusebius of Caesarea revealed his dualistic thinking in describing the “perfect life” and the “permitted life”. Eusebius wrote:

“The perfect life was the one God called the clergy to—a life of prayer, worship, and service to Christ through the church. Other occupations, while not prohibited, carried less dignity. The labour of farmers, artists, merchants, and homemakers was not evil, but neither was it blessed, and these roles were certainly not callings from God. After all, they were concerned with the things of earth, while the clergy were occupied with the things of heaven”.

The reformation in the sixteenth century responded to both this and the humanistic view established in the European Renaissance in the fourteenth century, rekindling a biblical understanding that both ways of living are sanctified in the presence of God. Miller (2009) writes:

“Recovering a holistic, biblical worldview, they [the reformers] recognized that there’s no sacred-secular dichotomy but only a consecrated or unconsecrated life. What had been considered secular, was now understood to be related to the sacred.” The Puritans had an even more extensive view of the theology of vocation. They described that each person had multiple callings that needed to be held together. They understood that every Christian had a highest calling, a common calling, and a specific calling. They believed our highest calling was not to labour, but to Christ himself.  “Theology of Vocation” by Skye Jethani

Even today, we experience the effects of dualistic thinking in the church. Cope (2011) says that “over the last century we have devalued work outside the church to the point that much of the body of Christ feels they did not get the “good gifts” like preaching or evangelism.” Further, the present-day church deals with a dilemma of a functional denial of the person of Holy Spirit as living and active in communication with us concerning our specific calling. Jethani (2014) says, “Christians are not equipped to engage their highest calling (communion with God) or to discern their specific calling (vocation).” To engage with God in the fullness of what He has planned for us, individually and corporately, cannot and will not be possible if we leave out a dynamic and ongoing relationship with Holy Spirit in our work place. Indeed,

“There truly is no division between sacred and secular except what we have created. And that is why the division of the legitimate roles and functions of human life into the sacred and secular does incalculable damage to our individual lives and the cause of Christ. Holy people must stop going into “church work” as their natural course of action and take up holy orders in farming, industry, law, education, banking, and journalism with the same zeal previously given to evangelism or to pastoral and missionary work”. (Dallas Willard)

If we are to be a people of influence that truly make an impact in the different spheres of society and in the lives of individuals, it is necessary that we embrace God’s perspective of vocation.

We continually ask God to fill you with the knowledge of his will through all the wisdom and understanding that the Spirit gives, so that you may live a life worthy of the Lord and please him in every way: bearing fruit in every good work, growing in the knowledge of God, being strengthened with all power according to his glorious might so that you may have great endurance and patience, and giving joyful thanks to the Father, who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of his holy people in the kingdom of light. (Colossians 1:9-12

For further reading I recommend:
Benner; D. G. & Green, T. (2009). Desiring God’s Will: Aligning Our Hearts with the Heart of God
Miller, D. (2009). Life Work: A Biblical Theology for What You Do Every Day
Nelson, T. (2011). Work Matters: Connecting Sunday Worship to Monday Work

Article first published through U of N’s Centre for Christian Formation & Discipleship, December 28, 2018

You may also want to read Waleska’s second article “Spiritual Formation and Vocation”

Waleska Laranjeira
Waleska has a degree in psychology from Pernambuco’s Federal University in Brazil and has over twenty-four years of experience in full-time ministry. She works with career development, encouraging and inspiring people to pursue a meaningful relationship with Jesus as well as to walk in their unique callings and strengths. She lives in Kona, Hawaii.

Why not explore some other featured articles

Grievance Procedure Paper

Process for Dealing with *Grievances Against Leaders (and other figures of authority within YWAM) *Grievance  –  an  official  statement  of  complaint  over  something  believed  to  be  wrong,  unjust or  unfair. Begin  with  the  concise  overview,  and  for  a  more  detailed  explanation,  click  on  each  link provided  or  go  directly  to  the  full  version  from  page  4. This  document  is  mainly  dealing  with  situations  and  conflicts  where  there  is  no  evidence  of criminal  offence  or  activity.  Where  there  is  suspicion  of  serious  criminal  offence,  we  are obligated  to  contact  the  police. OVERVIEW STEPS   TO   TAKE   IN   DEALING   WITH   GRIEVANCES   AGAINST   LEADERS CONTEXT STEP 1 When  someone  has  a  grievance  against  another  person,  they  should  go  and  share  their concern  as  Matthew  18  encourages.  If  your  concerns  are  not  heard,  Matthew  18  advises taking  a  friend  with  you  as  a  follow-up  to  help  in  the  dialogue.  This  may  be  difficult  because of  differences  in  position  and  influence,  but  it  should  be  attempted  to  keep  the  issue  and situation  as  low  key  and  relational  as  possible.  We  expect  that  most  cases  will  be  resolved here  in  step  1  and  kept  in  the  local  situation. STEP 2 If  a  resolution  hasn’t  been  successful  in  step  1,  a  simple  mediation  process  is  encouraged  with an  impartial  mediator  bringing  together  the  two  parties.  The  mediator  or  mediators  should  be people  who  are  agreed  upon  by  both  sides,  and  could  be  elders,  not  necessarily  in  line leadership,  who  have  some  understanding  of  mediation.  This  will  enable  both  parties  to  share 1

Read More »